Ordovician Crinoids
Ordovician crinoids and diversity patterns in the fossil record
Ordovician strata show a remarkable increase in diversity of fossils of marine invertebrates. While the Cambrian Explosion documents the abrupt appearance of most animal phyla, what we see in Ordovician layers is a significant increase in the number of distinct subgroups of such phyla (e.g., orders and families) in fossil assemblages. An estimated threefold increase in diversity of invertebrate marine families is observed in moving from Cambrian to Ordovician layers, a magnitude of increase that is unparalleled in the rest of the geologic column (Fig. 1) (Servais et al., 2009).
This jump in diversity has come to be known as the Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event (GOBE) (Webby et al., 2004) and has even been colorfully dubbed “life’s second Big Bang” (O’Donoghue, 2008).
Crinoids are an excellent group to illustrate the patterns of appearance of fossil taxa that account for the GOBE. Crinoids (also known as sea lilies) constitute a class within the phylum Echinodermata, the same phylum in which sea stars and sea urchins are grouped. Crinoids are benthic organisms that feed off detritus and plankton suspended in the water column. Their body plan typically consists of a stalk attached to a crown (Fig. 2). The crown has a central body (theca) from which arms (typically in multiples of five) radiate. These arms can be branched and feather-like, with appendages known as pinnules. Crinoids have a skeleton made up of numerous articulated calcified plates, which increases their potential for fossilization.
Echinoderms are among the invertebrates that contribute to the Cambrian Explosion, but there are no fossils of crinoids in Cambrian layers. However, disparate groups of crinoids appear in the Lower Ordovician (Fig. 3). The number of families and even orders of crinoids increases upward through the Ordovician layers, with some discrete pulses (Ausich & Deline, 2012). However, the main crinoid higher taxa or body plans are already documented from the basal stratigraphic range of crinoid fossils (Ausich & Deline, 2012; Guensburg et al., 2021) (Fig. 3). One could say that crinoids conform to a pattern of disparity before diversity: “Tremadocian [lowermost Ordovician] crinoid lineages became established in distinct regions of morphospace. Subsequent radiation through the Llandoverian [lowermost Silurian] primarily populated the same basic regions of morphospace” (Ausich et al., 2015, p. 947). What we see at the highest taxonomic level, with disparate Cambrian phyla being populated through the GOBE by more diverse lower rank taxa, is replicated at the level of classes within the GOBE, with abrupt appearance of disparate groups populated by greater diversity of families at higher stratigraphic levels.
This abrupt appearance of disparate forms with lack of ancestral intermediates is the fundamental challenge posed by the fossil record to the gradualistic model of an evolutionary tree of life.
Crinoids are a good example of the significant increase in diversity in Ordovician strata, because they mark the appearance of an entire new class of organisms with no underlying Cambrian fossil record. However, a similar increase of Ordovician diversity could be illustrated by many other groups of marine invertebrates (Webby et al., 2004). There has been some discussion to determine if the GOBE represents a pattern of gradual diversification throughout the Ordovician or if there are distinct pulses of diversification correlated across different invertebrate groups (Servais & Harper, 2018; Stigall et al., 2019). Irrespective of the overall pattern of diversity increase within the GOBE, when we zoom in at ordinal or familial level within specific classes (as seen for crinoids), the pattern is clearly punctuated rather than gradual.
Figure 1: Diversity curve of marine invertebrate families through the Phanerozoic fossil record, documenting the ‘Big Five’ mass extinctions (dashed vertical lines) of marine invertebrates (modified from Sepkoski, 1981; Harper, 2006). Arrow points to diversity increase corresponding to the GOBE. “Cambrian,” “Paleozoic,” and “Modern” refer to Sepkoski’s evolutionary faunas. Geological Systems (left to right): C = Cambrian; O = Ordovician; S = Silurian; D = Devonian; C = Carboniferous; P = Permian; T = Triassic; J = Jurassic; C = Cretaceous; T = Tertiary. Image modified after Liang et al. (2022).
Figure 2: Crinoid anatomy. Image by William Ausich, available at: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Crinoid_anatomy.png (CC 3.0).
Figure 3: Stratigraphic range of major groups of crinoids. Note the Lower Ordovician (Tremadocian-Floian) appearance of most major clades. Star symbol indicates that the GRI collection includes a specimen representative of that group. Classification of crinoids into Linnean high rank taxa has proved challenging. More recent attempts have adopted a phylogenetic approach for the establishment of crinoid clades (Ausich et al., 1998; Wright et al., 2017). This diagram follows the taxonomy proposed by Wright et al. (2017). Stratigraphic ranges are based on Ausich and Deline (2012), Cole (2017), and Wright & Toom (2017).
References:
Ausich, W.I., 1998. Early phylogeny and subclass division of the Crinoidea (Phylum Echinodermata). Journal of Paleontology, 72(3), pp.499-510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022336000024276.
Ausich, W.I. and Deline, B., 2012. Macroevolutionary transition in crinoids following the Late Ordovician extinction event (Ordovician to early Silurian). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 361, pp.38-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2012.07.022.
Ausich, W.I., Kammer, T.W., Rhenberg, E.C. and Wright, D.F., 2015. Early phylogeny of crinoids within the pelmatozoan clade. Palaeontology, 58(6), pp.937-952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12204.
Cole, S.R., 2017. Phylogeny and morphologic evolution of the Ordovician Camerata (class Crinoidea, phylum Echinodermata). Journal of Paleontology, 91(4), pp.815-828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2016.137
Guensburg, T.E., Sprinkle, J., Mooi, R., Gahn, F. and Lefebvre, B., 2021. Sea lilies in spring: crinoid diversification during the Early Ordovician. Paleontological Journal, 55, pp.985-992. DOI: 10.1134/S0031030121090045.
Harper, D.A., 2006. The Ordovician biodiversification: Setting an agenda for marine life. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 232(2-4), pp.148-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.07.010.
Liang, Y., Holmer, L.E., Duan, X. and Zhang, Z., 2022. Brachiopods from the Latham Shale Lagerstätte (Cambrian Series 2, Stage 4) and Cadiz Formation (Miaolingian, Wuliuan), California. Journal of Paleontology, 96(1), pp.61-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2021.80.
O’Donoghue, J., 2008. The Ordovician: Life’s second big bang. New Scientist. Available at: https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19826601-700-the-ordovician-lifes-second-big-bang/ (Accessed: October 2024).
Paleobiology Database, No date. The Paleobiology Database. Available at: https://paleobiodb.org/ (Accessed: October 2024).
Sepkoski, J.J., 1981. A factor analytic description of the Phanerozoic marine fossil record. Paleobiology, 7(1), pp.36-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0094837300003778.
Servais, T. & Harper, D.A.T. 2018: The Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event (GOBE): definition, concept and duration. Lethaia, Vol. 51, pp. 151–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/let.12259.
Servais, T., Harper, D.A., Munnecke, A., Owen, A.W. and Sheehan, P.M., 2009. Understanding the Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event (GOBE): Influences of paleogeography, paleoclimate, or paleoecology. GSA Today, 19(4), pp.4-10. DOI: 10.1130/GSATG37A.1.
Stigall, A.L., Edwards, C.T., Freeman, R.L. and Rasmussen, C.M., 2019. Coordinated biotic and abiotic change during the Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event: Darriwilian assembly of early Paleozoic building blocks. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 530, pp.249-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.05.034.
Webby, B.D., Paris, F., Droser, M.L. and Percival, I.G. eds., 2004. The great Ordovician biodiversification event. Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/webb12678.
Wright, D.F. and Toom, U., 2017. New crinoids from the Baltic region (Estonia): Fossil tip‐dating phylogenetics constrains the origin and Ordovician–Silurian diversification of the Flexibilia (Echinodermata). Palaeontology, 60(6), pp.893-910. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12324.
Wright, D.F., Ausich, W.I., Cole, S.R., Peter, M.E. and Rhenberg, E.C., 2017. Phylogenetic taxonomy and classification of the Crinoidea (Echinodermata). Journal of Paleontology, 91(4), pp.829-846. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2016.142.
Ordovician Crinoids at GRI
This sea lily is one of those that disappeared at the top-Katian crinoid mass extinction level.
Slabs that contain multiple associated specimens of this crinoid species point to the possibility that this sea lily had a gregarious lifestyle.
The arms of this sea lily formed an open-fan system of large area and low filtration density.
A sea lily which had a long stem that held a cup-like calyx above the substrate, where it could filter particles from the water.
Crinoids disarticulate quickly after death. Therefore, preservation of articulated stem, calyx, and arms, as seen in this slab, can only occur with rapid sedimentation rate.
This specimen was found in the Bromide Formation of Oklahoma, a rich source for crinoid fossils.
This sea lily is among the most common in the Bromide Formation of Oklahoma and its short stem made it a low-level suspension feeder just above the substrate.
This specimen comes from the Bobcaygeon Formation near Brechin (Ontario, Canda), a lagerstätte known for the exceptional conservation and diversity of Ordovician crinoids.
This holdfast, from an unknown species of Glyptocrinus, functioned to attach the stem of the crinoid to the substrate.
This sea lily with slender arms probably lived in deeper water where currents were slower.
This sea lily was characterized by stout pinnulate arms.
Ordovician crinoids illustrate another diversity pattern seen in the fossil record: mass extinction or coordinated disappearance of taxa at a specific stratigraphic level. In the Upper Ordovician, all clades of crinoids show a dramatic diversity loss at the genus level across the Katian-Hirnantian (Fig. 3) boundary (Ausich and Deline, 2012).
What else do we know?
Mass Extinction
Reference:
Ausich, W.I. and Deline, B., 2012. Macroevolutionary transition in crinoids following the Late Ordovician extinction event (Ordovician to early Silurian). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 361, pp.38-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2012.07.022.